Obama Should Take Stronger Stance Against Ecuador Coup Attempt

by Teo Ballvé

Unpublished, Op-Ed, Oct 02, 2010

The Obama administration needs to take a stronger stance against the recent coup attempt in Ecuador. Undemocratic power grabs in Latin America will continue unless Washington ends its habit of sending mixed messages.

Police rebelled in Quito on September 30 against benefit cuts planned by the government. When President Rafael Correa tried negotiating with a group of striking police, they fired teargas canons against him. Correa sustained injuries and was literally carried off the scene to a local hospital.

The mutinous police surrounded the hospital and attacked the building, while opposition politicians demanded the president's resignation. Correa was rescued from the hospital by loyal Army Special Forces amid an intense shootout and pitched street battles.

Citing coordinated action and the seizure of key airports and barracks by police, Correa declared the armed uprising a "coup attempt."

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released a brief statement saying the Obama administration "deplores violence and lawlessness and we express our full support for President Rafael Correa, and the institutions of democratic government."

The crisis in Ecuador comes on the heels of the successful coup against Honduran President Manuel Zelaya in June 2009. Zelaya was forced from office at gunpoint in the middle of the night and was whisked off to Costa Rica in a military plane — in his pajamas.

At first, Obama said, "I think it would be a terrible precedent if we start moving backwards into the era in which we are seeing military coups as a means of political transition, rather than democratic elections."

This was a laudable change from Washington's historical tolerance of — and in some cases outright support for — violent coups against democratically elected governments in Latin America.

But the Obama administration later backtracked when it recognized Honduras' new leader, Profirio Lobo, who was elected under what critics described as military rule.

Obama effectively helped set the "terrible precedent" he so feared.

Although most Latin American presidents have refused to recognize Lobo as Honduras' head of state, Washington has bankrolled the controversial government with at least $220 million in economic and military aid since the coup.

The Obama administration's whitewashing of the Lobo government in Honduras, where gross human rights abuses remain rampant, sent a clear signal that the persistence of coup plotters in Latin America will eventually pay off in Washington.

Indeed, shortly after the coup in Honduras, Ecuador's Correa warned, "We have intelligence reports that say that after Zelaya, I'm next."

This sadly proved true.

Mass rallies in support of Correa and the quick action of loyalist troops thwarted the coup attempt. But the situation in this Andean country could quickly deteriorate, posing a renewed threat to Ecuador's democracy.

Now it's up to Washington step up and make sure violent power grabs in Latin America remain the scars of the past, rather than the open wounds of the future.

    more articles

    • Morales Re-Election Shows Failure of U.S. Policies

      Miami Herald, Op-Ed, Oct 17, 2014

      The re-election of Bolivian President Evo Morales to a third term is a stark reminder of Washington’s self-inflicted irrelevance south of the border. His life history is itself a story about U.S. policy blunders in Latin America.

    • 60 Years After CIA Coup, U.S. Policy Hasn't Changed

      McClatchy-Tribune News, Op-Ed, Jun 16, 2014

      Washington stood on the wrong side of history when it overthrew Guatemala's democratically elected president on June 27, 1954. To this day, the U.S. government has failed to learn the lessons of its Cold War interventions in Latin America.

    • Colombia's Chance for Peace

      The New York Times, Op-Ed, May 23, 2014

      For peace negotiations underway between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Colombian government to break the country's cycles of violence negotiators must address land inequality and the drug trade as interconnected problems.

    • 20 Years After Escobar's Death, the Drug War Drags On

      The Progressive, Op-Ed, Dec 03, 2013

      Twenty years ago this month, U.S. authorities helped bring down Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar, but Washington’s global war on drugs has not let up. In fact, it has become costlier, bloodier, more widespread and futile.

    • Obama Administration's Global Surveillance Hurting U.S. in Latin America

      The Progressive, Op-Ed, Nov 01, 2013

      The backlash from revelations that the United States spied on world leaders once again shows the dangers of our runaway surveillance state. The Obama administration has got to rein it in. This time, it's our most important diplomatic alliances on the ropes.

    • Hugo Chavez’s Legacy: A More Independent Latin America

      The Progressive, Op-Ed, Mar 11, 2013

      Hugo Chavez proved that Venezuela and the rest of Latin America could chart an independent path in the world. Chavez was the first in a steady stream of left-leaning leaders elected to office in a region that Washington had once claimed as its backyard. Chavez was the most vocal advocate of this growing autonomy.